A Chuck Close portrait of the artist Alex Katz in the new 86th Street station on the Second Avenue subway line, one of 12 works by Mr. Close that adorn the station’s walls. Credit George Etheredge for The New York Times A Museum of Sorts, But Free You would be forgiven for mistaking the upper level of the 86th Street station for a museum or a Chelsea art gallery.
Dozens of visitors were in front of the 12 large mosaics by Chuck Close , taking photographs, identifying the people in the portraits and discussing the work.
“I cried when I saw the first one,” said Sheryl Yvette, 45, an information technology analyst from Greenpoint, Brooklyn. “You have to see it in person. It’s so moving.”
Adam Cohen, 29, a financial analyst from Long Island City in Queens, was patiently waiting for other visitors to move aside so he could take a photo of a large portrait of one of Mr. Close’s subjects, Sienna Shields.
For him, it was a tactile experience.
“I’ve seen his work in museums,” he said of the artist, “but this is different: You can get right in and touch it.”
Nearby, Adrianna Muñetón, 47, a law clerk from Briarwood, Queens, was doing just that. She ran her fingers over the beard of Mr. Close’s self-portrait.
“It is the most unbelievable experience,” she said. “And at no cost.”
Several blocks south at the 72nd Street station, Sumana Harihareswara, a consultant from Astoria, Queens, was walking through the new station when she came across a mosaic that stopped her. There, in gleaming tiles on the wall before her, was a woman of South Asian descent dressed in a burgundy sari, looking at her cellphone. Ms. Harihareswara was instantly overcome with emotion.
“I don’t think I’ve ever come across subway art before that makes me feel so seen,” she explained through tears. “This woman could be my aunt, she could be my cousin.”
Standing beside the mosaic, she and a stranger exchanged a knowing glance. “Representation matters,” they agreed, as several other people snapped photos of the woman wearing the sari.
Ms. Harihareswara, a longtime transit enthusiast, said she was struck by the diversity of the subjects depicted in the mosaics throughout the new stations, which also showcase a mural of a gay couple holding hands.
“There is no feeling quite like seeing yourself cemented into the infrastructure of New York,” Ms. Harihareswara said. “It lets me know that my city loves me.”
Video A New Subway Line for a New Year An event on New Year's Eve included a ceremonial ride on the new Second Avenue subway from the 72nd Street station to 96th Street.
By EMMA G. FITZSIMMONS and DAPHNE RUSTOW on Publish Date January 1, 2017. Photo by Benjamin Norman for The New York Times. Watch in Times Video » A New Year’s Eve Subway Ride to Remember Shortly after 10:30 p.m. on Saturday, a group of elected leaders and transit officials climbed on board a train at the new 72nd Street station for a memorable trip uptown and into the history books.
“Welcome on the first ride of the Second Avenue subway to 86th Street,” Thomas F. Prendergast, the chairman of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, said over the loudspeaker. Cheers erupted.
The New Year’s Eve soiree and inaugural ride was an exclusive event deep underground ending with a merry countdown to midnight. There was the chairman-led tour to new stations at 86th Street and 96th Street, music by a rollicking jazz band and an array of snacks and local beers. Subway officials and their guests, dressed in bow ties and sequined dresses, toasted the hard work it took to build the huge subway tunnel below Manhattan.
Nearing midnight at the 72nd Street station, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, who effectively controls the authority, took the stage, telling the crowd of hundreds that the opening proved that government could do big things. He and Mayor Bill de Blasio, both Democrats, had briefly greeted each other earlier in the night, despite their frosty relationship, though the mayor did not speak at the event.
Charlie Feliciano, the conductor on the inaugural ride, said he had volunteered to work on New Year’s Eve.
“It was a lifetime experience,” he said. “I did it!”
Photo Workers dismantling a section of the elevated subway line along Third Avenue in Manhattan in 1955. The Upper East Side has had to make do with only the overflowing Lexington Avenue line in the years since. Credit Sam Falk/The New York Times The Tortured History of the Second Avenue Subway It is a story that stretches over 96 years , but we will try to keep it brief.
The idea for a subway line along Second Avenue was first proposed in the 1920s but faced a series of obstacles that delayed it : the Great Depression , the city’s financial crisis in the 1970s and broken promises when money that might have gone toward the project was spent elsewhere instead.
The elevated train lines that served the Upper East Side were taken down in the 1940s and 1950s, leaving the neighborhood with only one subway route: the overflowing Lexington Avenue line that was a long walk away for many people.
“In many ways, the Upper East Side has kind of suffered with density without the infrastructure,” said Thomas K. Wright, the president of the Regional Plan Association. “This is trying to right a historic mistake.”
Finally, in the 1990s, the plans were revived, though subway officials decided to start with a smaller segment of the line, from 63rd Street to 96th Street. Construction began in 2007, to the dismay of some businesses and residents who endured shaking, clanging and dust as the work proceeded.
The Metropolitan Transportation Authority faced doubts about whether it would meet a deadline to open in December 2016. Under Mr. Cuomo’s prodding, though, workers were able to complete the required testing so that the line could be opened for an inaugural ride on New Year’s Eve and to the public on Sunday.
Photo A new subway map including the extension of the Q line. Credit Alex Wroblewski for The New York Times What’s Next for the Second Avenue Subway? Some longtime New Yorkers may look at a map of the new line and wonder: Is that it?
The city once imagined the Second Avenue subway running nearly the length of Manhattan, and possibly even into the Bronx. But officials scaled back their ambitions, choosing to build in phases, with the first one serving the Upper East Side neighborhood known as Yorkville. Many in the area are excited about the opening, but are also concerned about the prospect of rising rents forcing out residents and businesses.
The next phase calls for the transportation authority to extend the line uptown to 125th Street in East Harlem. But that leg of the project, which could cost up to $6 billion, is still in the early planning stages and may not open for another decade. And leaders in East Harlem have already had to fight to restore funding for the segment after it was removed from the authority’s capital budget in 2015.
Officials have said that they eventually want to extend the line south to Houston Street and then to Hanover Square in Lower Manhattan for a total length of 8.5 miles. Given how long it took to build the first segment, it may be wise to tell your grandchildren not to hold their breath.
While some have criticized the line as puny, Gene Russianoff, the longtime leader of the Straphangers Campaign, a riders’ advocacy group, said it was an important start.
“It’s the beginning of what could be a glorious line,” he said. “It has tremendous potential.”
Correction: January 1, 2017 An earlier version of a photo credit with the 1955 picture of the elevated subway line along Third Avenue misspelled the photographer’s surname. It is Falk, not Flak. An An earlier version also misidentified the name of the the chief engineer of the Interborough Rapid Transit, New York’s first subway in the article text and a picture caption. He was William Barclay Parsons, not William Benton Parsons.
Continue reading the main story
No comments :